I apologize to Michael Pacholek, John Barry, and everyone else here. I realize that free speech is what separates us from Communists, Nazis, etc. I enjoy using my right of free speech here. I will start shoowing the same respect for othe rights of others too. I hope I can be forgiven.

As Joseph Welch told Joe McCarthy, "Were it in my power to forgive you, I would, but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me." (These are the words that followed, "At long last, have you left no sense of decency?" The jury appears to still be out on whether Lurker has any.)

Hmm... Michael is up to more of his grand writing with more "dumb" and "stupid" words! What a vocabulary giant, a pillar of maturity, a graduate of the second grade! And the line, "That guy makes dumb attack" >?< I could not agree with you more, he does tend to make the dumb attack... look at you!

Lurker, really please! These people, especially Michael, don't give a rip about other's freedom of speech if they have the opposite viewpoint of their own thwarted minds. They are (especially Michael) a bit on the blowhard side and without perspective or wit, (nor apparently a decent vocabulary). Why lower yourself and ask anything nice of these thugs? (Especially Michael), who feels as if he is some sort of an 'amiright' god... ---- I love the name of this site! Am I Right -- of course I am in both directions!

Linda, the only right direction you and Bush have taken us is right into the ground... in the case of 2,300 American troops, literally. Not to mention right into the gutter. You bums were right about one thing while Bill Clinton was President: It is a a terrible thing to have a President whose immorality knows no bounds. But it's Bush who's proven it. You wanna talk about my vocabulary? You're a shrew, a shrike, a snake and a lemming, whose capabilities are miniscule, diminutive and microscopic, with no chance of reversing or accumulating. Words big enough for you? You need a thesaurus? Or do you think a thesaurus is a dinosaur? 'Cause your party is full of dinosaurs, which is ironic, since they don't believe in evolution. Clearly, you have not evolved from your past intellectual troglodytism. You wanna criticize my politics, go ahead. You wanna criticize my parody writing, write something better -- if you can. So far, you haven't. In that regard, and in criticizing my vocabulary, you're bringing a knife to a gunfight.

Right, right into the ground! The economy shot up faster than the toughest critics, there are more home owners than renters for the first time in our renting history of about 25 years and more black Americans have purchased homes than in any time in history. We have a prescription plan and I already know personally four people who can now afford prescriptions at their $1 and $2 each price. President Bush had the guts to go after all the bad guys, your arse is protected by strength, not cowardly sorts like Clinton, who was more concerned about his popularity than he was the safety of our country. Four times Bin attacked and then declared war on the US and three times the CIA handed Bin to Clinton on a silver platter. He was right there out in the open, not in hiding, (since who would be afraid to attack the US with the likes of a playboy hippie in office)? Now he and Hillary are fighting because his position (and huge gains financially), are in conflict with her opinions on the ports, that’s funny! Bush had more EPA warnings issued, close downs and fines on industry in his first year than Clinton had in his whole presidency. Our jobs are at continued growth and the pay average is substantially higher than was Clintons. Bush taxes the wealthiest in our country and the middle-income earners as well as the low-income earners with HIGHER taxes than did Clinton. Clinton raised the middle income taxes. Bush lowered the poverty rate, pushing more people into that bracket so they could A. have tax breaks and tax credits, (helping them get out of poverty and securing additional money in the future with credits), and allowing more families to get aid and help because they are in that area. That move was called, (by the dirty demoncraps on the left �" i.e., Dean and moveon.org, possibly more) as this, “Bushes new budget is going to make more American families suffer from poverty” �" well yeah, dumb shyts, that’s the point! However, do they mention details, hell no! Then they say that those already in poverty situations will soon be pushed down further into poverty, again, duh! They make it sound like Bush is taking money away rather than giving more, that’s the crooks you vote for honey! In fact, the entire email from moveon.org and dean were totally, 100 percent false! Their implications were horribly distorted and you should start looking things up rather than following the crowd around who is being taken further into misery by the constant daily harping and whining of the more than deceitful left. No matter how many times you call the right bad or corrupt etc., it won’t take away the fact that your party is using that crud as divisional tactics while they and their double-standards and total hypocrisy play on! In fact, they have done nothing but make this country more divided in the last several years and they love it! They are paid for doing nothing at all but drumming up untrue, uncalled for crap while we are at war. Bush can handle both, apparently, and they are as useless and as evil as they come! This was their plan some 3 months after 9/11 �" the guttersnipes! They cannot win by platform or merit, ethics or job performance, so they resort to this divisional hate stuff, half truths and false attacks they feel they will deal with later and after people as weak as yourself have come to believe their tall tales. They know that even after the real truth comes out, little minded imps such as yourself, still refuse to see the truth and prefer the original lies that help them run from their nasty pride over voting for losers twice! FDR would think them horrid, as would JFK, (not the Kerry Cowardly brown nose either) and both would be very ashamed by the tactics and depravity of the party this decade calling themselves the demoncrats

So who asked you to grab a dictionary and post a comment as if you were some important person? Who asked you to (yet again) come out and be a show horse, a self-promoting big man huh? FREAK! You show off so readily that you really do not give your responses much thought, kind of like you do with your parodies. Over all, this song was not impressive, mostly not your own words, had horrible vocabulary, was rushed and redundant as heck. Yet, you brag and give corny intros as if you did some masterpiece work �" some grand art here… Something that called for a half moment commercial that is basically, a bragging self promoting thing, keeping your level of superiority among the little rankers in this site, huh big shot guy? ---- ---- ---- By the way, your intro has to be the corniest thing I’ve seen around this place! You sound like a TV commercial at best. And if that song convinced her father of anything but her inane attraction to remedial, its surprising. To think that it took such a simpleton song written out the same old cookie cutter weak minded fed opinions to bring him to her line of thought is hysterical. If he is that stupid after all his years on this earth as to be enlightened by a song that has no substance at all, yet a lot of noise, then who needed him in the party anyway! After all, 200 elected officials have moved from the liberal demoncrat party to the republican party since Bush took office and one guy listening to his daughter named ‘pink’ who can only manage to get as deep as was shown in that song and this one for that matter, is not a guy who even belongs in our party. We save the seats for people with thinking skills, not middle aged men who listen to their crazed daughter who listens to the same trash talk as you. Hey, and we have Lieberman on our side and he ain’t so bad! ---- ---- ---- No matter how cute or cool you lead yourself to believe your inane response here to be, your parody vocabulary and creativity level suck are juvenile to the core. They are rushed, as always, because you are more interested in getting the quantity up than you are putting out anything of quality, (and that my friend is the truth, like it or not). At times I think you are really believing you are good, a good writer, and I find that really difficult to comprehend. ------- --------- Over all, this song was not impressive, mostly not your own words, had horrible vocabulary, was rushed and redundant as heck. Yet, you brag and give corny intros as if you did some masterpiece work �" some grand art here… Something that called for a half moment commercial that is basically a self-promoting thing. You must keep up the impression that you are smart and you are at a level of superiority among the ‘little ranks’ in the site, huh? Because if you didn’t you’d lose all your own self esteem and then what would you do? You’d have nothing but your fake, phony superiority based on �" pretty much nothing, and your everlasting hate your were told to have by the black herders on the left. That a dime won’t even get you a cup of coffee big shot man!

I will give you this constructive criticism, (because again, I am the better person); ‘this song is more sorry than the last few’. See, Michael Egocentric, you tend to repeat the chorus’ the same all through your songs. That tendency, as explained a long time ago by a parody writer here who is a ‘real’ parody writer who has ‘real’ skills, turns people off to reading through the song. One skips over the repeated chorus’ - trying to get though it, and reads what little of the song is left quickly. That habit leaves less for the reader to enjoy (or roll their eyes at as I do with yours), as the repeats are just a bore. I saw his point, but then again, I never wrote for quantity and skipped the quality issue, as is your habit. How could you possibly think your songs are original when you use most of the org. author’s words/lines and don’t make up new chorus’, (too much work I suppose), and then you use the same old, “stupid” and “dumb” vocabulary as the last ‘parody’? That’s not even a real parody; it’s just taking some song’s lyrics and playing a very small game of Mad Libs�" (rushed through Mad Libs�"). Really, poor work and I have no clue how you could base your entire esteem in life over the ratings of fanatics who, like yourself, have no perspective. Then to deny how terrible you are because your warped mind thinks, “I am Michael and I am talented, I earned my right to be king here, all the people think my stuff is great, and I am first in line to say so too” is REALLY far gone! The reality is that those people who tell you how great you are the same who would hate your stuff if it were pro right and anti left. How hard is that to understand? Your parodies have little substance, are old news most of the time, use most of the org. author’s words, are redundant as heck, have a limited vocabulary and are written as if from an almost graduated 5th grader. To them, what’s not to love when they are born followers w/weak minds that have been led and fed to hate someone and a regular at the joint writes a piece that reflects their own thoughts, (as you are all just cookie cutter thinkers). They are thrilled, you are praised, and the real truth does not ever reach you. You are not so good �" sure, you can just whip a whole lot out fast crud using the org. author’s stuff 80 percent of the song and then type “dumb” the other 20 percent �" however, any normal people would not give your parodies another read. In any case, I am sure that if you wrote a true blue bash the left, praise the right and Bush parody, your troops would turn on you & hate your work �" just as you hate parodies from anyone who sides on the right. It keeps with your party’s hypocrisy, double standards and code of ethics… (What code, really). But whatever sense of false esteem you get here, apparently is enough for you. I suggest you stay in your fantasy land as long as possible, because with that mind, you are likely to only see losers who admire you for the loser you are & that may be too tough for you to deal with in life.
At least with me you get honesty, not the ranting of a child sinking deeper into childhood. And you say you are unique and have new material, do you really believe al the bull you throw out at others? Do you really think that others are as stupid as you hope them to be compared to you, or as you think, they are compared to you? Unique, original, grown-up, knowledgeable --- you just aint

"Never argue with a fool. Listeners can't tell which is which. "

I may disagree with what you say, but I shall defend to the death you're right to say it.....fighting for oil in the name of a Christian god, however, might be a different matter altogether.

I'll keep this as brief as I can. The economy hasn't "shot up." Population growth alone should have created 7 million jobs by now if Bush had simply continued the Clinton policy 2001-05. It's been about 5 million. You have a prescription plan that is confusing most, appalling plenty, and gaining few converts. If Bush "had the guts to go after all the bad guys," we would now be buying oil from the President of the Federal Republic of Arabia. By the way, where is bin Laden? It was Bush, not Clinton, who promised to get him... "Dead or alive." bin Laden was never handed to Clinton, not by the CIA, not by the Sudan. That lie has been proven. Wages are down in relation to inflation. A right-winger like you is in no position to say what FDR or JFK would think. They are turning over in their graves over what is happening to their country. Sure, I show off. As that great liberal Mel Brooks put it, "If you got it, flaunt it." Yes, you have Lieberman on your side. You can have him. He's a political transvestite in the tradition of Pat Moynihan, and if Gore had chosen a real Democrat, he would have won so big it would've been impossible to steal. As for "Teddy," well, you gotta face the fact that Bush writes a lot of my material for me. It's not my fault that a lot of songs turn out to not need a lot of revision. I almost did one to "Razzle Dazzle" from the movie "Chicago," then realized that I didn't have to change a word.

Pacholek you ignorant, arrogant, "demoncratic", free-thinking, creative, parody-writing communist, what the hell is wrong with you? (And I've given you such a pass for being a citizen of New Jersey and Yankee fan - a two-time loser in my book - if you were a republican, it would be like hitting the trifecta.) You (among several talented writers here) should never succomb to a challenge in an argument where you must highlight or justify your writing as a defense; nor should you ever use it offensively. Dude, I'm losing respect for you - you challenge Linda and Lurker? Give me a break - what do you gain? Is there a question as to who is the more talented writer? Even though they're wrong, I learn from the critiques of Guy and JJ. This is your league - don't lower the bar. bob

I'm not lowering the bar, Bob, I'm lowering the boom. By the way, whatever happened to the aforementioned Guy DiRito? Did he just get frustrated and leave? I hope it's nothing more... ominous than that. Despite his politics and his Texocentrism, I liked him, and I loved his parodies. He was an evil genius, but a genius nonetheless.

Agimorfee - That is merely an opinion that has no actual facts to back it up, just ‘sounds good’ and helps in your recruiting via distortions and lies. In fact, has been proven wrong by bipartisan committees, (note the “s” and the end of the word committee). Furthermore, the “Christian God” comment, is yet another bunch of baloney created in an effort to bring the Christians around to your side of the fence or better still, make them believe that what they believe is silly nonsense. Putting down Christians and God is a theme that has many passionate partisan far left idiots working overtime with urgency! Putting others down for their beliefs is wrong, twisted and gutter, its unethical, evil and dishonest. To say you are the party of tolerance is laughable. The demoncrat party has become a lot of desperate and disturbed warriors for their cause and will use anyone, anything and sink to any level to win. One must do what ever they can to win votes; fool the black Americas into thinking that Democrats are needed for their very survival, mocking and putting down Christians and continued distribution of ideas and rumors that have been shown to be false must be the best you’ve all got! Certainly your platform lacks, so I suppose the dirty democrats must do what they must do.. Enjoy �" you are an ace �" but be warned, don’t tell your party leaders that killing your momma would get them an extra vote on election day because she will be dead before you have finished your entire sentence to them! Desperation can kill you know...

Nice you wished to keep your rebut ‘as brief as you could’, however it was not brief enough to benefit your cause at all. In fact, it completely supports my view of how terribly snowed you are. In fact, you are positively either A. So snowed by your own party’s deceptive and desperate (and dishonest to say the least), propaganda and that is where your information stems almost entirely or B. You are just lying all by yourself, making up things as you go along and attempting to make it sound true and real. So one way, you are a sucker and the other way, you are a bold face liar. Which is it? --- ---- ---- ---- You say that the economy has not ‘shot up’, and that is your first bold face lie. The budget deficit too a rapid decrease, dropping by 94 billion dollars. The IS RELATTIVE to the size of the economy and cut the deficit measure of the GDP in 2005 by 1.0 percent. This improvement in the outcome for 2005 stemmed from the >>>> ROBUST growth <<<<< of federal revenues over the last 2.5 years. Revenues as a share of GDP rose sharply from 16.3 percent of the GDP for the year 2004 and ROSE 17.5 percent above that level for the year of 2005. To compare, this is the highest revenue growth and economical boost since the all time high in the years just after the World War II time, where it grew 20.9 percent. This growth in revenue SURPASSES CLINTON’S BEST AND IS MUCH BETTER THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN YOUR LIFETIME AND MORE! Individual income tax receipts accounted for more than 40 percent of the last year’s boost in revenues, which increased by 15 percent. Another increase in revenue and growth was due to the changes in tax law which caused the largest growth in Bush’s presidency is 2005. In addition, receipts from the corporate income tax were 47 percent HIGHER last year and that followed the same INCREASE in receipts / revenues from 2004 and late 2003. Those receipts in recent years have grown FASTER THAN THE ECONOMY AS A WHOLE, INCREEASING FROM 1.2 PERCENT OF GDP IN 2003 TO 2.3 PERCENT IN 2005 �" THEIR LARGEST SHARE OF THE ECONOMY SINCE 1980! THIS GROWTH IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE SOLID ECONOMIC ACTIVITY FROM LATE 2003 THROUGH 2005. In addition, receipts from social insurance (payroll) taxes ROSE by MORE THAN 8 percent in 2005 alone as a result of the increases in wages and salaries, also a fallout from that economic growth

Your entire statement regarding the economy and how it has not “shot up” is laughable. Why don’t your demoncrat leaders harp on the economy as they do the deficit? I don’t know where you get your information or how you come to your totally bogus claims, but you are one misguided know it all. Regarding “simply continued the Clinton policy 2001-05 is the most ridicules notion I think you have ever lied about. You know very little about the economy, growth and the difference between the growth and deficit and you are sorely wrong. You may take tidbits of sections, and I have proof of that too, but you are so busy creating your high number of parodies and acting like some big shot who knows what is going on, you obviously have little or probably close to NO TIME to figure out the truth on your own. Your reliance on propaganda and a party of desperate - desperate demoncrat leaders leaves you in a VERY IGNORANT place indeed! This economy has spiked, no matter how much your lying self wants to imply differently! You cannot just “say” something is true and POOF, it becomes true! I have called you on that before, do you think that I am that stupid as to NOT know what I was talking about and post it in the comments section for God and all to see? That’s your game, certainly I am not so foolish as to make claims hoping everyone is too stupid to know them or that no one will actually figure it out or look it up! You are not nearly as smart as you portray, you are more of a USED CAR SALES PERSON and a bragger than you are a truthful, fair, honest person. What gets me is why someone would continue to be so inherently dishonest time and time again and think to himself that he deserved the ‘power’ given him by those stupid enough to fall for your consistent bullshyt! Don’t you know inside some place that your esteem is gained FALSELY? Don’t you realize how deception and faking it all makes for false esteem and for a fool? Is that really your path? Your entire statement regarding the economy and continuing on Clinton’s way is unbelievably dim and you really should be more ashamed of yourself for lying to people, it’s just wrong. (that is the first statement, the rest of it, (just as bogas as your first line), will come in a few �" I have to go out, lucky you. But I am not going to just run from your total lies. It is one thing to have opposing view points on political concepts, but it is by far a whole new matter when someone provides bold face lies as you do! This parody of yours should have been called "STUPID MICHAEL" for accuracy sake

Robert J. Pagliaro --- 'My baby loves me because he told me so' ------ ------ there is no accounting for taste

She so funny.

What, no comment from the great Michael yet? Ah, well, I will have to finish up the other questions soon... not tonight, just got diag. with cancer, bummer, but still going to stand up for my beliefs, just like you... those facts will come, keep your eyes out, soon!

Nah, he just can't hear you. Painful, innit, to be screaming and get no response? If Michael's wise -and I trust he is-, he'll choose not to comment.

PUDDLE -- -- It's not painful at all �" hardly - it is typical. See, Michael does respond when caught lying or making up his own facts, like in this case! When presented with proof that he made up his own facts and propaganda, he suddenly disappears! This cop-out is consistent with him as is his running from the realities he fights so hard to contradict. Michael responded to posts after this one, a long time after as a matter of fact! He did not make any factual claims in those however; he just boasted about how wonderfully great he is in those comments, see the difference? I do agree with you, however, when you say, “If Michael’s wise, he’ll choose not to comment” �" that’s because it would look silly to deny real proof and make him look like more of an idiot when he faces his own lies head on! I showed him on this page that Bush did something great, against all odds and much better than his idol Clinton, and the sap could not handle that reality or the fact that he lied to his subjects here! -- -- -- I have to laugh about that one part where you wrote, “and I trust he is” �" because apparently, he just wants you to think that �" when clearly he isn’t even close!

Oh, Linda, Linda. Blah, blah, blah, logical fallacy, straw man, appeal to fear, blah, blah, blah. If you are going to rant about things that Bush supposedly did, please cite your resources - your alleged facts are questionable.

Come on now, this was NOT the least bit off-paced. I can understand if you don't like a parody's content, but please have the courtesy to respect the pacing.