Basically my reaction to the now-passed Anti-Cybercrime Law in the Philippines, of which was widely criticised for resembling the U.S. Stop Online Piracy Act, and for including the oh-so-outdated and draconian libel and anti-filesharing provision. Sure, pedos, spammers and all other criminals should be put behind bars, but from what's in RA10175, it sounds more like martial law all over again.

* - The Republic Act No. 10175, aka the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. Opponents of the bill, including origanisations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, have expressed grave concernover it as at least some of its clauses reeked of being draconian.

** - Libel through online posts may result for up to 12 years in the can according to RA10175.

*** - Benigno Aquino III recently greenlighted the act, in a move that many netizens derided.

**** - Referring to the Freedom of Information bill which is still pending as of the time of this writing. The anti-10175 movement also cited that (greedy) politicians can be affected by it, hence the alleged plot to have it shelved.

This work is labeled as Kopimi, meaning that the copyright holder of this work specifically requests that this work be used and copied for any purpose, including unlimited commercial use and redistribution. It is believed in good faith that a work classified as Kopimi is free to use in any way, including modification and the creation of derivative works.