Making fun of music, one song at a time. Since the year 2000.
Check out the two amIright misheard lyrics books including one book devoted to misheard lyrics of the 1980s.
(Toggle Right Side Navigation)

Song Parodies -> "But Kill the Babies, Pt 1"

Original Song Title:

"Pop Goes the Weasel"

Original Performer:

Traditional

Parody Song Title:

"But Kill the Babies, Pt 1"

Parody Written by:

Linda Terhune

The Lyrics


My first parody actually, but when I filled in the forms, I did it wrong and so, here it is again, (with permission of course), enjoy!
Save the forests, save the trees
Save the whales and buggies
Peace, joy and love abound
But Kill the Babies

Never go to war because
It's better spread out apologies
Clean the air and spread your bliss
But Kill the Babies

Bleeding hearts and big brothers too
Hands stretched out with some daises
All are one a, socialist crew
But Kill the Babies

Serial killers are people too
Those on welfare aren't lazies
Tax some more - help both survive
But Kill the Babies

Your Vote & Comment Counts

The parody authors spend a lot of time writing parodies for the website and they appreciate feedback in the form of votes and comments. Please take some time to leave a comment below about this parody.

Place Your Vote

 LittleLots
Matches Pace of
Original Song: 
How Funny: 
Overall Score: 



In order for your vote to count, you need to hit the 'Place Your Vote' button.
 

Voting Results

 
Pacing: 3.4
How Funny: 3.0
Overall Rating: 3.2

Total Votes: 32

Voting Breakdown

The following represent how many people voted for each category.

    Pacing How Funny Overall Rating
 1   12
 14
 12
 
 2   0
 1
 3
 
 3   1
 1
 0
 
 4   2
 2
 2
 
 5   17
 14
 15
 

User Comments

Comments are subject to review, and can be removed by the administration of the site at any time and for any reason.

Stephen Harrington - March 28, 2006 - Report this comment
Umm.... I don't get it, does it have something to do with abortion? I don't know what to rate this parody, so no vote. Sorry.
Michael Pacholek - March 28, 2006 - Report this comment
You mean the babies who die in hospitals because their parents have no health insurance? Who freeze to death because their parents can't afford to heat their homes? Or have homes? Strange, how right-wingers usually stop being "pro-life" after American citizens are actually born.
U. Phemism - March 28, 2006 - Report this comment
MP's got it. As is said, for the "pro life" movement, life begins at conception and ends at birth.
Luke Brattoni - March 28, 2006 - Report this comment
^LOL!
World Record State Deficit At Large - March 29, 2006 - Report this comment
Right Wing Discrepancy 101: An American woman has the right to defend her home and kill an intruder, but if the intruder manages to rape her first and she becomes pregnant, killing THAT intruder is not allowed!
Linda - March 30, 2006 - Report this comment
Stephen Harrington -- Don’t be sorry about the rating, ratings don’t mean a whole lot at this place anyway. Those who complained in the past about people giving out all ones, for example, are some of the very ones who turn around and give all ones. This is done mainly by those “tolerant” folk, like Michael, (just below your comment), who, as hypocritical as he can be, rates political parodies that do not subscribe to their own OPINIONS and are not in his political party, with all ones. He has complained and put others down for doing that, yet, brags about it when he does it to others. Therefore, the rating is not really an accurate way to determine good and bad parodies. As long as those who are intolerant, full of double-standards, (do as I say, not as I do), and who are as egocentric as Michael as to think they have the only correct opinions in the whole United States, (and there are a lot at of that type at this site), the numbers are meaningless. See my “ones” above, the pacing is fine, but the INTOLERANT far left partisan wackos would rather give more facts to their lying habits than to give a score that would be fair. Anyway, unlike those like Michael, I have esteem outside of a web site and don’t rely on this place to build my whole life’s worth. ---- And yes, it is about abortion, indirectly. It is more about how the trees and whales mean more than those who cannot fight for themselves and must die because the baby killers are inconvenience by them and the costs of this form of birth control are much better, especially when taxpayers foot the bill.
Linda - March 30, 2006 - Report this comment
Michael the Genius writes: “ “ You mean the babies who die in hospitals because their parents have no health insurance?” “ --- --- That’s an easy one, NO! (Gad, you are dumb). Then Michael writes: “ “ Who freeze to death because their parents can’t afford to heat their homes” “ --- --- I don’t know Michael, who? Then he adds, “ “Or have homes?” “ --- --- What? Finally this ever-so-articulate blowhard writes: “ “ Strange, how right wingers usually stop being “pro-life” after American citizens are actually born” “ Hmm, that’s odd for many reasons, (none of which are regarding the tired theme of that last line at all). What it seems that you do not understand or know, Michael is that the pro-life groups are trying to prevent the slaughter of innocent babies, and the barbaric live-birth abortions " both of which are eagerly supported by the demoncraps. I suspect it has more to do with the huge financial benefits that they receive from the abortion doctors association to be on that side, (they often toss in principal and ethics when it comes to big bucks, and lie- lie - lie about that too). So I would tend to think that since the groups who are ‘pro-life’ focus on those unborn children and their slaughter, they are hoping for the birth of the babies, (not unlike the thousands of couples who cannot conceive and are on waiting lists for years and years to be able to have one that the left so freely wants killed). So frankly, that last line is a no-brainer, an idiot remark and typical of what you would say. Finally, the most obvious thing about your comment in general, is that you use the same old tired and silly lines fed to you by your herders. You heard it, thought to yourself, “darn, good one”, and then made it a part of your playbook, as did the rest of the simpletons on the far left. When backed into a wall and feeling that attack, you can be counted on to toss on the table the same old tired crud that all the rest of you cookie cutter baby killers on the left do. Good for you, you are highly defensive, short fused, small minded ignorant who cannot keep on topic! What a proud asset to your party you are! It is so typical of you Michael, to divert, change the subject around and make it someone else - - your constant refusal to address the subject at hand and deal with that is very telling. Seems you are in deep denial, deeply fed and led and programmed to the hilt and have no words at all when backed in a corner, (almost every time). You have diverting mastered to an art, double standards are second nature to you and you are clueless about the realities going on around you. But hey, you are that self-proclaimed king of amiright and isn’t that all that counts? LOL " you are such a maroon!
Linda - March 30, 2006 - Report this comment
To WORLD RECORD LEFT WING IDIOT AT LARGE: Well Mr. World, you win for the most stupid post yet! First, it’s an incredibly infantile comment and makes you sound like you are all but maybe five years old, (as the other comments I have read from you). Other than that show of immaturity, it is an extremely rare occurrence. MOST ALL abortions, oh yea of little mind, are on women who have had at least one before with an average of two! Unless the majority of women who get three abortions in their lifetimes do not do so due to intruders. If that were even remotely true, then they need much more help than an abortion could give them. > > > > > > > > > > The FACT is that <0.5% of abortions are from unwanted sexual relations, or rape. Of that <0.5%, over half of them knew who had done it, or at least admitted that they knew who did it. The number one reason for abortions have tied recently and they are both at 21.5% of the women and reasons… one is “unready for responsibility” and the other is “I can't afford baby now”. Keep in mind; the women are mostly those who have had more than one abortion, most two! Next in line is “concerned about how having baby would change her life” coming in at 16% (all fairly selfish egocentric reasons huh? Especially considering the years on the waiting list for hopeful parents who desperately want a baby) Then there are the women who make up 12% of the multiple abortions with the reason given being; “have problems with relationship or wants to avoid single parenthood” Golly gee, so kill the baby! Nest at 11% we have those who admitted to being too immature of young to have a child, (but not too young or immature to hop in the sack and then use abortion for birth control, multiple times! Then you have the women who give the next highest reason, 8% say that “they have all the children they wanted or all children are grown and they don’t want to start over again”. Then tied for the 1% of all women are - “partner wants her to have abortion” and “doesn't want others to know she had relations or is pregnant”. The lowest in this group aside from the “rape by and intruder”, which is next to none at all” you have the “woman's parents want her to have abortion” group who chime in at a whopping <0.5% So you see, you wise blowhard, your grand statement is pretty insignificant. Then there is the misc. reasons that came up rarely: “planning to study and a baby would interfere” “can’t afford child care” “would have to find new place to live” (?) “Currently on welfare or public assistance” “partner does not work” and “would interfere with career plans” Isn’t that sweet! In the year, (the most current I could get until the 2005 to 2006 reports come in, 2005 to 2006, there were no reported abortions, even live birth abortions, that had to do with a life and death situation. When it comes right down to it, the list of people who would love to have a baby just like all the normal couples can, either wait for years after a long process or they adopt overseas babies, (which is increasing in this last decade). It is more than obvious that those couples are missing thousands of chances per year because of a selfish, self-centered society led in this killing spree by a party who gets paid big bucks to endorse it with all they have! Nevertheless, killing is wrong, live birth abortions are extremely cruel, selfish, and very barbaric " and you, you are an idiot baby killer who has only an idiotic cop out of an excuse for murdering
PS Liberal People - March 30, 2006 - Report this comment
The abortion doctors, (who get a LOT of money since they need very little staffing and charge huge amounts for the few moments they are actually performing the abortions " and the ones who front all the money to the demoncraps), came upon that “women’s right” angle! That was their brilliant idea and they provided the left wing baby killers with it when the public was nearly all against the procedure. Then it suddenly became part of the constitution, a “right for women”. Just think, the gullible in this country and the things they believe, or just wish to believe because it makes their own life better, their own needs taken into consideration above and beyond the babies, God’s rights etc. In fact about every 8 years or so the left has changed the constitution in some form, and now send these “warnings” to the people that the right is trying to change the constitution! And you vanillas believe everything you are fed, especially the goodies that make excuses of your law breaking, change the laws to fit your desires and all for more votes! You were snowed; you are not some lot of entitled citizens merely because you were born here! The country doesn’t owe you a damn thing and I should not have to pay your inability to keep your pants on MULTIPLE times each! The truth is that you, my liberal hell raising led and fed sheep, you are a lot of whining, self-absorbed drama queeny morons who have an entitled “me me me” attitude without any reason or merit. Simply being born here does not really make you entitled to tax payers money in footing the bill for multiple abortions, (and other entitlements you all think the country and the working in the nation “owe you” for some silly reason. You have this “ME ME ME ME ME” mentality and that’s the base for all your whining and unethical behaviors and constitution changes. The people in the party are there because they have that ME ME ME mentality, they only are snowed into thinking that they have “rights” (they made up) and we should all be equal and cater to them. Mostly, the party is a lot of socialists, gullible ignorant people or those trying to take advantage of the left’s wild and lose laws because they ‘get more’ than they have to earn themselves. That’s the reason why the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of MEN are republicans, (with of course the exceptions " those ‘boys’ (like those in this place) who are not really “men” men and are more like spongers)
Femalacian Liberal - March 31, 2006 - Report this comment
Please explain why you think it's an argument here that the "OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of MEN are republicans", when the right to abortion is an OVERWHELMING female issue? (Unless you're really a right wing nutcase MAN yourself it makes absolutely no sense at all to bring that up).
Michael Pacholek - March 31, 2006 - Report this comment
Strange, how she says I have a big ego, and then engages in the greatest exhibition of literary onanism since Gore Vidal was in his prime. The NRA, Big Tobacco, the polluters, and the people struggling to prevent more fuel-efficient cars, all give more money to the Republicans, and kill more people, than a few doctors who provide women with the means to exercise their reproductive freedom. Not to mention that YOUR medicos also contribute more... as do YOUR trial lawyers who protect them from their malpractice, malfeasance and malediction. One more thing, and then I can let you back into your delusion that more than one out of three Americans still support your boy: I am not the King of Amiright, self-proclaimed or otherwise. There is only one royal here, not a king but a princess. It just so happens that I have been the recipient of a good deal -- a very good deal -- of her regal largesse. But she's a figurehead. Here, we believe in democracy, and you're outvoted. The background is green, but this is a Blue State.
Linda - April 01, 2006 - Report this comment
Femalacian Liberal - two seperate sections of my comment... there are more men by far in the republican party and the left does abortion - but I did not combine them as you did.
Linda - April 01, 2006 - Report this comment
Femalacian Liberal - two seperate sections of my comment... there are more men by far in the republican party and the left does abortion - but I did not combine them as you did.
Linda - April 01, 2006 - Report this comment
"Literary Onanism" huh, there goeth the mentality of the demoncrat! (nice choice of words, typical gutter) --- ---- "Big Tobacco" as opposed to the small kind? Good thing the left can blame the right for "big tobacco" YET, do you think for one moment if it came down to them, the left only, and they could do it with just a vote among them, any of the left leaders would get rid of tobacco? NO WAY! The LOVE that "big tobacco" - you are forgetting, those taxes on cigarettes, (some 2 bucks a pack), pay for children's programs, environment, education extras and a host of other programs for the enhancement of our natural resources and our children's education extras all over the country! They would never give up the millions a year - ever! (duh) ------ --- ----- Hmm, seems to me like the farmers are ECSTATIC with Bush and his new program for corn fuel, they love him and that is an alternate fuel... how about Bush's new regulations for mpg on all the newer autos, vans and trucks? That is suspected to save 500 million barrels a year in fuel the first year and more from then on... much more! And wasn't it Kerry during election time who told the auto worker's group he owned an SUV, then in a rally just the very next day in a whole new state claimed he did not own an SUV and then when called on that "fib" by a reporter, he says "my wife owns that car, I drive the others" Michael, don't be a showboat with me, you are programmed, I am not! Yeah, kill more people -- not by a long shot!!!!!! First of all, it was the GOP which was formed to end slavery and the Demoncrats who refused to let their property slaves go free, they brought on the civil war to fight to keep slaves and they had Americans killing Americans, tons! Next we have JFK, you know, that war you all say is so bad, the one where John F Kennedy sent troops to Nam? MORE of our men, (not counting any deaths over there), but MORE men died from our country in one day than our men have died in the >>>>>>> ENTIRE Iraq war >>>> "Exercise their reproductive freedom" my arse! They are killing innocent babies and slaughtering like barbarians big babies with their gross live birth abortions, millions die and we foot the bill... most women have had more than one who come in to the clinics, the average. is 2, so you can think of your precious abortion as a 'women's right to reproductive freedom" if you want... I call it senseless murder - baby killers, who are too lazy to get birth control and too self-involved to take responsibility for that life and at least let adoption happen! It's a totally selfish, unethical act.. but hey, you like your baby killing because your party likes the money - bottom line!
Linda - April 01, 2006 - Report this comment
---- ----- ----- As for your sentence beginning "Not to mention that YOUR...." - I know you are showing off with the big bad words you found in your thesaurus, but when you write with one and include a lot in each sentence, (as many as you can fit it seems), you tend to screw the sentence up so in fact, it is more a joke than it is funny... just in the fact that you sound so incredibly dim! Save the thesaurus for your songs, those are the ones that never include anything over 5 letter words, mostly "dumb" and "stupid", they need the most help, in comments you just look foolish! (but it is pretty funny to read) ---- ----- Yeah yeah yeah, your last point is very telling! You are the PARTY of TOLERANCE, the Party who only says 'democracy' when it fits them and then cry 'no checks and balances' when you are in a double minority! The party of hypocrisy and double standards is more like it... the party of intolerance is good too.... the party that gives freely of hate and untruth - then gets their own people really solid and let's them spread it around to the public in the most disghusting ways possible... each time, (and there have been many), the truth comes out, but they don't tell --- NOPE, they just allow their angry disciples to wallow in hat and anger for "their cause" - that's how much they care about you sheep! Sure, your crap spreads, but only to the weak minds who fall for good marketing by desperate politicians and join the ranks of the baby killing morons! (and some never find out the truth because they are too busy praising themself on amiright, too busy showing examples of double stadards and too busy to do research or exercise perspective to know up from down, (as seen by their silly notions) - some are too busy getting huge numbers of songs out, (rotten ones but its the count that counts), to even know reality - and too busy basking in the praise of far left wackos who feed his ego and do him a disservice in doing so!
Femalacian Liberal - April 01, 2006 - Report this comment
Linda uses many words to try to divert us from the fact that she has exposed herself as a Republican Male Supremacist posing as a woman. That's verbal internet transvestism and I'm sure God won't look down favorable upon him/her for it. Furthermore, unable to face the facts of the current situation in the world he/she flees into ridiculous historical revisionism and non-moral but plain economic statements about how abortions is a debt post for the taxpayers. That's at best ignorance and at worst an outright lie. So here's another piece of undisputed fact I'd like to see him/her adress; In every country in the world where abortions have been legalized there has been a HUGE and at first seemingly unexplainable DROP in youth crime some 15-20 years afterwards. America saw that drop begin during the 90s and it has continued since. Unwilling mothers are to a greater extent unloving mothers, and their unloved kids grow up with more than average risk of becoming criminals. Criminals are a cost to society far bigger than abortions, hence the economic upside to society from allowing legalized abortions, though it kicks in a generation too late for the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of MEN who are Republicans to understand the connection since they normally have a hard time to understand any economic reasonings beyond what can be cashed in quarterly. But there's an upside to finish off with here: Since our "Linda" sees no difference between criminals and liberals in the first place maybe he/she could actually come to understand that supporting abortions of "criminals to be" is also a way to stop kids from being born blue!
YAD - April 03, 2006 - Report this comment
Hey Linda, I hope you read this, I heard you were diagnosed with C, I really want to wish you good luck and support. And I voted a 545, your parody makes one think.
Linda - April 05, 2006 - Report this comment
Feebleminded Liberal writes: ---- ----- “””””Linda uses many words to try to divert us from the fact that she has exposed herself as a Republican Male Supremacist posing as a woman.”””””” = = = = ==== That statement shows your immaturity right off the bat. To be taken seriously, one would think that you would A. Not make yourself look like a total idiot in most everything you say and B. Do more than work with a Thesaurus to attempt to look intelligent, (especially with sentences that contain multiple topics and key words that are spelled so poorly one needs to guess at the meaning of entire sentences. As for the particulars of that statement and the next one, I really do not care if you believe I am female or male. Apparently, you need to make up ridicules notions to help yourself look important or smart, but it doesn’t help your cause as your attack did not answer any questions addressed. Overall, it was a showcase of your stupidity and forum for your ignorance. = = = = ==== Perhaps you can “adress” the countries in which you made up your reasoning and the stats you found to support not only your claim, but the connection. I would guess you have no such information and, as most of you do, made that up to sound good. That practice is common among you desperate demoncrats, who would do or say anything to support your ‘over-the-top’ claims. I certainly do not know who you are trying to fool or impress, as most of the super weak minded and impressionable in the country was taken into believing a lot of silly things they stick to even in the face of cold hard opposing facts. == == == == == I have noticed that you speak to “whomever” is out there, which consistently shows more of your juvenile thinking and inability to direct your ‘questions and wisdoms’ to me. That fact is a clear sign of your lacking in conviction with all that garb you wrote. You should look up the word “revisionism” as I have proven, (consistently), to be nothing close to that, unlike the demoncrats who are on a constant plight toward Marxism. As far as “non-moral but plain economic statements about how abortions is a debt post for the taxpayers” " I say, what? What is “non-moral” about my facts about the economics of abortions; give me specifics as to how you figure them to be non-moral. You are over-the-top stupid! We pay for abortions for women who have had multiple abortions more so than those going in for the first time, we pay " so what is your “un-moral” point? This whole post of yours reeks of sentences that do not make much sense and are more ‘show off’ than anything else " hardly impressive in both content and structure, good job! You also completely failed to address the years and years a couple must wait to obtain a newborn or the fact most are getting their adopted children overseas now. Hmmm, I wonder why you avoided it, perhaps I would shoot down your entire theory, (as if your immaturity, stupidity and juvenile notions of my gender did not already do that)
Linda - April 05, 2006 - Report this comment
Yad, --- yeah, true and thank you so much, you are very sweet.
Femalacian Liberal - April 07, 2006 - Report this comment
I find only one new argument in your new big garbage pile of diversion: That couples that need to adopt must wait for years and years to "obtain" a newborn. As if a newborn to "obtain" was a God given right for those who can't have one themselves! Have you ever stopped to think that maybe some people can't have babies because GOD doesn't want them too? Because GOD has other plans for those people. That they were born for a different purpose than parenthood? That they are going against the will of GOD if they buy a baby from someone else, abroad or at home? I'm sure there are a lot of frustration involved when a couple discovers that they can't have a baby, especially for the woman due to historical reasons, but ill hidden envy towards those who can but prefer to postpone are no reason to be against abortions. If GOD wants you to have/raise a child it'll come some other way.
Immoral Liberal - April 07, 2006 - Report this comment
Femalacian Liberal - you have much too much common sense. See, the fascists believe that God only punishes the "non believers". And, you're not allowed to play the "God" card - only them - you see, God is made in their own image. By the way, you must have a lot of patience to be able to read and then digest the rants of Terhune - I always have to stop reading the rhetoric when I hit the first reference to "demoncrats" and "baby killers" - thankfully, it's generally within the first five words of her drivel.
Lucy - April 08, 2006 - Report this comment
IM--LOL and well said. linda's rant's are as boring and frothing crazy as ever--if she is a "she" that is!!
carol - April 08, 2006 - Report this comment
linda where the hell do you get off dissing some of my best written parodies with your pathetic frothing dribble??!! F*ck off and die you dumb bitch!!!
Linda - April 21, 2006 - Report this comment
SAILOR CAROL HITS YET ANOTHER ONE OF MY PARODIES with yet MORE COMMENTS THAT ARE NOT RELATED TO THE PARODY, (What a classy lady huh?) ------ nope, she rolls right in and comments on her own personal attack drive ........ ..... Sadly, it's the same old stuff post after nasty potty mouthed angry little impish post! ......... yawn .. .. .. .. BUT there is NEWS............ Little sweet innocent manipulator sailor mouth CAROL is............ also........... LUCY!!!! ---------- and poor carol is right back to manipulation once again................. deny it all you want SAILOR MOUTH.......... but I have PROOF, proof TIMES 3!!!! ---------- there is no fool like a fool who thinks she is cool, nothing so weak as a person who iives like a sneak.......... nothing so sad as a little person acting all bad............. I SPY ..... ... -- that YOU CAROL, have a very limited vocab.......... you just LOVE LOVE LOVE the word FROTHING..... ... .. .. use it all the time ----- one has to wonder - -- --- did you just learn that word and feel a certain yummy pride when you use it, like you are even bigger badder sailor mouth? ---- gosh - but it doesn't work ----- ---- -- ------ You are about as clever as the trapped rat who tries to chew off her leg in order to escape but chews off the WRONG ONE! (or almost that clever, you may still be in that more dim area, you know, you'd prob. chew off your tail insted ....... but you'll grow up, one would hope anyway..... HINT: being a manipulator with so many explosive issues, a hypocrite, one who lives by double standards, one who dishes it out but just cannot take it... a denial ridden, fake of a person ---- a multiple.... (the sweet victim who is just so confused about why when she is sooo sweet, big bad people still say her innocent little self is a dishonest pile of shyt.... woe is me.... whine whine, sniff sniff ---- -- -- --- then, there is the real you, the SAILOR MOUTH, sort of white trashy kind of wannabe....) ----- Anyway, being all those things will just make it really hard to ever grow enough in life to ever be happy or real or important..... so you can deny till "you die" (you love that die linda thing too.... ouchie, like anyone's NOT going to die)........ or you can chuck your thick arse issues, be real for once in your miserable life..... stop the endless game playing and childish school yard games.......... deal .......... and then go for happiness.. ..... (This is a sincere observation and a really sincere bit of advice for you..... for reals) .......... you'll never be truly happy if you don't ---- and who likes game players who rarely ever stop their game (unless called on it and then gets all pissed off to the stupid point?) ----- you know? ---- "where the hell do you get off, dissing some of my best... " ---- -- -- blah blah blah -- -- -- keep it on your page......... where people can see the post, see the comedy ......... see my REAL observations ......... and not just some off the wall nut case who is out for blood on ever pages possilbe..... who is obsessed to the max and likes to say "die" and "frothing" a whole lot! ---- --- remember --- --- -- STICKS & STONES LUCY! ----- ------ -(sing along) ---- --- -- - Lucy says to 'die' & ' frothing' ... ..... ... lucy loves to lie ... .. ... and plays games ....... LUCY on the fly is CAROL ...wooooo ho.....
carol - June 09, 2006 - Report this comment
you're brain is fried . Sorry what brain?
Joseph Goebbels - August 16, 2006 - Report this comment
Ja! Take away the American swines' right to choose abortion if desired! Stop them from just approaching women on the street and stealing fetuses from them at will! Make the women perform abortions in back alleys and die from the infection! While you're at it, burn the Constitution! You sound like my kind of girl, Linda!
Gina Longway - December 16, 2006 - Report this comment
Legal or not, some women are going to get abortions; by making the practice legal, we actually SAVE lives. Roe vs. Wade made abortion an option for women " not a mandate. If you don’t want to get an abortion, stay the hell away from the clinic. You must be an ignorant fool if you think this failed attempt at satire is going to influence anybody to feel the same way you do.
Below Average Dave - December 16, 2006 - Report this comment
I felt it was paced well, I didn't find it all that funny as either side of the fence on abortion tend to be radical or extreme . . .I tend to stay away from politics. . .that's why I use this site--for fun parodies. . .this one was about a serious topic, and thus I couldn't rate it one way or the other because I don't feel it's really meant to be funny. . .topics of that nature generally just inflare too many people to make fair and equal ratings based on the quality of the writing, not the person's personal beliefs. . .rating: NA/NA/NA . . .
linda - November 26, 2007 - Report this comment
Joseph Goebbels / Gina Longway – you certainly sound like angry little kids. Regardless, there are thousands of couples who would adore a newborn baby but are on endless waiting lists or going outside our country to adopt (many from China). Last I have checked, it is God who has the right to choose and your voting for abortion with your demoncrat vote takes that right from God and gives it to women who are too lazy to go out and buy concerteptives, (i.e., you are baby killers). Most women who get abortions today have had at least one before – so they use it as birth control – sick! And the fact is, medical reasons for abortion are less than 1 percent (which is an excepted abortion for all sides here). Now your radical baby killing anti-God clan wants to make it okay for all women, even those 11, 12 etc., years old to get an abortion without parent’s consent (or knowledge) (when they are required to get parent’s written consent to get their teeth cleaned) and rip babies out alive up to 9 months old in the tummy! Bottom line (and again), it’s God’s right to choose, not some lazy women who plays russian rulet and decides it’s better to kill babies than to mess with a restrictive condum.
Immoral Liberal - November 27, 2007 - Report this comment
Linda you ignorant loon - I thought that you had gone the way of Ann Coulter, Newt Gringrich, Trent Lott and all the other right wing nuts. But noooooo, you and your drivel are back - welcome! Last you checked it was God who has the right to choose? And who did you ask? God? Give me a break. Neither Nixon, Bush nor God are above the Constitution. And that's the fact, Jack. Now some of you fundamentalists would say that contraception is a type of abortion as it prevents procreation. And, I thought that you nut jobs believe that pregnancy is a blessing from god. If so, then it doesn't matter if a woman is "too lazy to go out and buy concerteptives (sic)" - right? God would havwe blessed them to be lazy. Interesting how you call 11 & 12 year olds women yet Monica Lewinsky - a consenting adult - was always called a girl by you nut jobs. Isn't the unjust war enough for you people? And you may want to go back and reread Roe - abortion at nine months is not legal. Your understanding of the facts appears to be on an elementary school level. If you think it's God's right for anything perhaps you should go and live in a Theocracy like Iran maybe. While Dumbya claims that God told him to invade Iraq, this country is not yet and never will be a Theocracy - and you can pray all that you want to.
Linda - December 18, 2007 - Report this comment
Immoral Liberal Bore --- You thought I had gone the way of Ann Coulter, Newt Gringrich, Trent Lott but "no" I am back? Does that mean Ann, Newt and Trent were here and left? Sorry I missed them, they are all great people - smart and bright and right! I guess you hate them, maybe like you must now hate Lieberman for backing a republican candidate for president - you demoncrats do eat your own! No man-made constitution is above God! That's just silly kiddy thinking - He made the men who wrote that document - those founding fathers who built our country with God as their strength and with a Christian foundation - smart men indeed! By the way, the constitution doesn't give any mention to abortions (murders). Demoncrats are just a-moral and like to kill millions of innocent babies because they are most brave killing those who cannot fight back.... Liberals - Hard of Fetus' - Soft on Terrorism! PS you can't wish religious people or religion away simply because by mocking them/it. Those, like you, who openly trash and bash Christians and their beliefs are almost always people who have very very low self esteem and find the only way to feel bigger and better about their sorry selves is to put them down and put their beliefs down. Only then can they get their much needed but temporary false esteem - In reality, you only show utter weakness when you do that – but I never really thought you were a strong person in the first place – so no real loss here.
littleCupCakes - December 18, 2007 - Report this comment
Sir Dave, I agree with your advisement that this should be a place for laughter! And I for one really need laughter, when it comes to this particular subject , as I was never able to have a baby. My ex-Husband left me for 'greener pastures', shall we say, which left me in this veil of tears.

The author of the parody has authorized comments, and wants YOUR feedback.

Link To This Page

The address of this page is: http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional1083.shtml For help, see the examples of how to link to this page.

This is view # 1664