Booooring... a real snoozer... thanks for nothing

Adam? Never heard of you. Care to elaborate on your insightful comment or are you just a cowardly troll? I liked it, by the way....Stones and Thrones Baby!!! Well done!

Adam has never seen "Game Of Thrones".

Melanie should know the fate of Moors back then. Her fantasies are invalid. Yes, I've seen GoT and Outlander is better and more realistic. Checkmate butthole.

http://www.bhagwad.com/blog/2013/personal/three-reasons-why-game-of-thrones-is-overrated.html/

Robert, would you mind just using your real name next time? Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Claude Prez and Opie M.: thank you. Adam: The merits of Game of Thrones have nothing to do with the merits of my parody. My pacing was excellent and you should and others should have acknowledged that. Giving me low points just because you dislike the subject is mean and pointless. Oh, and about the Moors: to my knowledge, they were African Muslims who invaded Spain and Portugal and stayed for centuries until Ferdinand and Isabel chased them out in 1492--which allowed the monarchs to send Columbus on his journey. While in Iberia, the Moors contributed much to Spanish culture, and they were surprisingly tolerant of other religions. Now, do you have something to add about Moorish history?

^ apparently eleven people disagree with you. Btw, GoT takes place in the late 15th century. The Moors were on the way out. Bringing up Columbus doesn't help you either. America was discovered by Vikings five centuries earlier! Vinland had nothing to do with Spain nor the Moors. Here's a link concerning the Arabic influence in Spanish: https://www.quora.com/Why-isnt-Spanish-more-influenced-by-Arabic-after-centuries-of-Moorish-rule-compared-to-how-Norman-rule-completely-transformed-English-in-Britain

You do realize, Melanie that it isn't elenven people who disagree with you. It's one person voting 12 times who disagrees with you

i think the parody is good, but Game of Thrones is lacking the last two seasons. Not very much storyline not character development, but lots of sex as distraction. The first couple of seasons were the best IMHO.

Eponymous: I suspected as much--which makes the word "apparently" in Anonymous' last comment a weasel word. Now, why would one person take the time and energy to disapprove 12 times of one person's parody? Really, is that person so threatened by me?

Even more mysterious is why he or she would disapprove 16 times, because that's the new total

Question? If Melanie's parody is so damn good, where is all her support and 5s??? Also, how can anyone distinguish between valid bad votes, troll votes, pseudonym votes, and other? Did one person also give this parody a 2-2-2, 3-3-3, and 4-4-4???

We can use common sense which says that 4 scores of 1-1-1's is completely ridiculous, let alone 17, because Melanie doesn't have a single pacing error in her parody. We also know there's an author here who has some bad blood towards her because she has called him out for his total disregard for pacing. And we suspect that this author is inflating the negative votes because that is the only possible explanation for that ridiculous number

That's apparently what happens to anyone this particular person doesn't agree with. Think of it as pattern recognition. I used to try to be friendly with him (I'm always friendly with noobs, and qualitywise he still look like one most days) but then he started attacking other authors in the comments field of my parodies and I told him off. Since then I've been in the club, i.e one of those getting clubbered with lots of 111s and some 222s and some 333s on almost all parodies, even the best ones.

The only thing you can do is slough off the idiocy of petty internet douchebaggery. Don't engage the trolls.